I lol at all those Killzone vs Crysis threads.lulz.I mean seriously what game in the industry(Consoles and PC) can currently match that
http://www.incrysis.com/index.php?option=c...ask=view&id=768

VS lulz
http://blog.gamer20.com/wp-content/uploads...e2_3speech1.jpg

Your Opinions will be much appreciated

Crysis wins because of its awesome graphics.

Killzone fails because of their shtoopid commercials.

I though those crysis screenshot are IRL :lol:

killzone has bullshitted is fans all the way through its production, releasing cgi cutscenes as in game footage in both games, as well as then showing the shittest gllitchiest first looks ever (killzone 2 looked like low settings hl2 but grey with dissapearing torsos). and although the in game footage they finaly showed isnt that bad on people, those masks look fucking crap, the guns look pretty decent but i think that might be a filter from all the badly smattered blurring on the rest of the pic.

also, whys that closest helghasts eye lighst shining through his helmet on the left lol?

dad bought that yesterday but doesnt want to play it till next week, i really want to see his reaction:P

also crysis in dx 10 is a completely different game, it looks great on 9 as it is, but 10 takes it that last step into truly imitating life, it adds fog in the forests and perfects every touch...shame you need that shitbag vista for it...and i'm not holding much hope out for seven either...they should just give up while their ahead and put ten on the next xp service pack lol.

I WIN :lol: i don't like any FPS!

no...... that means u lose :ph43r:

I could give a fuck about graphics.

Why do I need a game that I'd require a super computer to play when I can buy a console game at most just needs a patch on the system it goes too?

Sorry, but PC gaming may get the edge in graphics, but it falls flat when it comes to accessibility.

Dude, for me graphics are not everything in a game but they are still important and i think that's why we put "VIDEO" before the word "GAME".

Lulz that's always the same argument most of consoles player use when There's a comparison between Pc and Consoles capabilities only,no one has been talking about the cost here.It cost too much? lulz what do you expect ,if you want cutting edge technology you will have to pay for it and there's nothing wrong with that.

The 360 and Ps3 tech are so fucking dated by now and yet people still looking down on Pcs like the Wii :lol:

And you don't need a Super computer to play Crysis at settings putting Killzone 2 to shame.Any mainstream computer can decently run it. :ph43r:

*points furiously at his somewhat better than mainstream computer that only barely chugs alone with RE4 installed*

That's main stream garbage. He's talking about the slightly above average to average.

when i think of killzone i go like this
60mil+sony=good game
60mil+any other develpor=OMFG! MY EYES ARE BLEEDING AGAIN!
just think thats how much they sunk into it. and i think they did it just too boost console sales becuase are they ever gonna make a profit? lol microsft just make masseffect 2 wth 60mil dollar we will die but it would be worth it
:ph43r:

El-B, I fucking love you.

When KZ2 was first announced, and I first saw that "in-game" footage. My first thought was, "I can totally see this back-firing in a few years." And guess what, IT DID. I want KZ 1, because it looks slightly fun, I do not want KZ2 for 2 reasons.

1: Overhyped to the point of faggotry.
2: Congratz, you over-hyped the fucking holy piss out of this game!

But, I have an Nvidia 9800 GT. I can play Crysis remotely high, get some lag at the beginning, but it's just getting used to everything, I do however need a new motherboard, and some more ram. So then, I can play Crysis on super-High, only to want SUPER MAXIMUM FPS and tune them down.