View Full Version: Signatures and stuff

The Rockman Exe Zone > Graphics Corner > Signatures and stuff



Title: Signatures and stuff


Careno - April 12, 2008 04:46 PM (GMT)
user posted image

user posted image

What do you guys think?

Nemomon - April 12, 2008 05:02 PM (GMT)
Because i always liked Your work, this time i like it too. byut second one more. As well as Your avi and sig (but we talk about that early).

DarkElpizo - April 12, 2008 05:54 PM (GMT)
nice ones
i really like them
however i;ve seen to much with rockman
GET... i have no idea
great,all i can say

Dark Protoman - April 12, 2008 07:30 PM (GMT)
Those are pretty awesome. The first one pwns.

Subaru Stelar - April 12, 2008 07:54 PM (GMT)
Your sigs are always awesome. The first one totally pwns!

hss - April 12, 2008 08:51 PM (GMT)
QUOTE
Your sigs are always awesome. The first one totally pwns!

i completely agree with subaru stelar :-) :-) :-)

Kage - April 12, 2008 10:14 PM (GMT)
megaman has lightbulbs for eyes O-O you really need to get better fonts ._.

OliveStripes - April 13, 2008 06:55 PM (GMT)
I like both.
But the 1st is my fave.
GREAT sigs though!!! :p

Dark ShadowX - April 15, 2008 11:54 PM (GMT)
First One:
Great pen tool work, the depth is pretty nice, but could be excuted a bit better. Also, lighting needs to be worked on, they're just coming from random areas.

Second One:
I don't really like it, sorry. Blending is nice, but overall, it isn't that great. (Sowwie). Depth looks like it was artificially simulated by placing some C4Ds/Brushing on top, and lighting is off too.

Overall, I think lighting is the area you need to construct in.
Sorry if I was too harsh, =D.

Dark Protoman - April 16, 2008 12:59 AM (GMT)
I think the sigs were meant to look darker...

Zeblid - April 16, 2008 01:33 AM (GMT)
wow. I dont know what it is about these, but I have to say, I ****ing love them. Great job!

Cepheus - April 16, 2008 02:06 AM (GMT)
Both are awesome, though I think the first one is the better of the two

Dark ShadowX - April 16, 2008 02:12 AM (GMT)
QUOTE (Dark Protoman @ Apr 15 2008, 04:59 PM)
I think the sigs were meant to look darker...

It's sort of a graphics term, lighting is not making the sig brighter, but it is how the light in the graphics piece flows, and how it effects the other things in the piece.

Careno - April 17, 2008 04:46 AM (GMT)
Thanks to all of you who commented.

Dark ShadowX: The second one is a fail. I just posted it for the heck of it. It was mostly to test out new techniques, which I have better mastered. There isn't any real lighting in this one. The first one is sorta meant to have mixed lighting. To make the background appear to be some type of aura energy thingy.

Again thanks to all who commented, I would thank everyone seperatly, but that would get repeatitive after the 4th person.

Here is the outcome of my newer style:

user posted image

Is it great? Eh. Do I like it? Very much. Does it need work? Yup.

Kage - April 17, 2008 05:22 AM (GMT)
revert dam you, revert! that bad, very ._. it reminds me of most beginning PS users... C4Ds on top of a render ._.

Dark ShadowX - April 18, 2008 12:10 AM (GMT)
The tag has a good concept into it, Roxas going into that light, but it could've been executed better.

The focal point is not defined clearly, it's a lil' blurred.
Also, the depth is off, Roxas in the foreground is all blurred while the light in the back is crisp and sharp, it should be the other way around. The sharpest thing in the sig should be the Oathkeeper keyblade, since it is the 'closest' to us.
I feel the Oblivion keyblade is too dark, especially when so close to that light, so make it a little brighter, and maybe the tip of it in the C4D.

Overall, it looks good to the eye though.
Sorry if I sound mean, I mean, I'm an artist after all, lol.

Megaboy08 - April 18, 2008 01:20 AM (GMT)
wow they all look so cool especially the first one




Kage - April 18, 2008 05:23 AM (GMT)
I still don't like how the C4D is over the render, covers it up ._.

QUOTE (Dark ShadowX @ Apr 18 2008, 12:10 AM)
I'm an artist after all

get over yourself ._.

Dark ShadowX - April 18, 2008 01:42 PM (GMT)
o.o, Get over myself what?

lol

Falzer - April 19, 2008 03:31 AM (GMT)
QUOTE (Careno @ Apr 17 2008, 04:46 AM)
Thanks to all of you who commented.

Dark ShadowX: The second one is a fail. I just posted it for the heck of it. It was mostly to test out new techniques, which I have better mastered. There isn't any real lighting in this one. The first one is sorta meant to have mixed lighting. To make the background appear to be some type of aura energy thingy.

Again thanks to all who commented, I would thank everyone seperatly, but that would get repeatitive after the 4th person.

Here is the outcome of my newer style:

user posted image

Is it great? Eh. Do I like it? Very much. Does it need work? Yup.

Funny seeing you here Careno...

It's me, CW. Sup. XD

OliveStripes - April 20, 2008 12:14 AM (GMT)
Love the 1st one. The 2nd looks great too, but erm, the render itself looks kinda . . . awkward? p[^^]p
I love the lighting though! :D Can't say anything bad about that. I'm a fan of your work. But also, I recommend downloading some new fonts.

Careno - May 4, 2008 07:48 PM (GMT)

Megaboy08 - May 5, 2008 01:29 AM (GMT)
wow great wallpapers i like the second the best :D




Hosted for free by InvisionFree