Well I doubt this is going to get very far but here goes anyway:
http://z6.invisionfree.com/Trukz/index.php?showtopic=10474I recieved a 20% warn for calling a post "stupid". I do not think that was an appropriate action considering that I was not attacking the poster, I was reffering to the fact that the content of the post was stupid, because it called for a war between religions.
My point is that it is getting extremely ridicilous to issue warns for calling things "stupid". Where does it go from here?
Edit: Read this totally wrong, sorry Alco, but which warn was this for, can you find the date you were warned?
Thank you for re-opening this. The warn was from DMW devil on December 5th for flaming. It is from this thread
http://z6.invisionfree.com/Trukz/index.php...pic=10474&st=30middle of page 3. I understand that I probably shouldn't have said that, but I honestly don't think it deserves a 20% warn for the reasons I stated in my original appeal.
Well, mods and admins don't generally go over each others heads for this, so I'm going to leave this open for dmw devil to decide on whether or not he wrongfully warned you, and I agree with him here on this warn, even if it wasn't the worst of posts. Secondly, you normally have to wait 1 month for the warn to go down, but since your not appealing the warn, your appealing that you were wrongfully warned, I'll leave it open for Dmw.
If you look at this infraction relative to others, it's not so bad; however, when you consider the verbal warns that led up to this one, the punishment is apt as if one violated his probation.
I will certainly not overturn this - a game admin might say different, but given that you were just suspended in-game as well, I don't think you'll be getting much sympathy from any of them either.